The 2017


(Updated 5/8/2017, final results)

JPEG Image
Some of the excited 2017 participants!

The competition was Sunday May 7th.


There were 52-flights, with lots of action. Congratulations to all that competed. Here is quick overview of the results.

JPEG Image

First Place - Team T.E.A.M. (Nathaniel Baum, Jai Kishan Chadalawada, Liam Collins, Chris Fernando, & Tuong Ha).


JPEG Image

Second Place - Team NFS (Kushal Dave, Ola Khaleel, Xiu Jie, Priessia Niswantari, & Neville Tay)


JPEG Image

Third Place - Team Fusion (Bret Gordon, Nadhir Malik, Alberto Mosqueda, Sang Nguyen, & Thomas Tran)


Here are some specifics & scores from the event.

JPEG Image



Special thanks to our pilot, Jonathan Mowrey. He is truely amazing!

JPEG Image

Jonathan Mowrey - THE PILOT


Here are some more photos from the event.

JPEG Image

Team Air Capital Aerospace's plane in flight (pretty)!


JPEG Image

The happy alumni team (Team NTFN)!


JPEG Image

Team ICT preparing to open their box and to assemble their aircraft (in less than 5-min)!


JPEG Image

Team NFS in the zone, where their payload landed - a bull's-eye!


JPEG Image

Team T.E.A.M. showing you their bull's-eye!


JPEG Image

A small part of the crowd behind the sceen.


What a year, thanks to everyone who participated, supported, and attended the event!




The material below outlines the 2017 competition and background. Be sure to watch this site for 2018 information (likely to be posted in August 2017).



Background 2017

The Aerospace Engineering department annually sponsors an aircraft design competition. The goal is to encourage involvement in a fun and educational activity.

Competing teams design and build an electric-powered, remote controlled, aircraft to fly a challenging mission. Undergraduate winners get their names on the Bronze Propeller Trophy. The eighth competition will be held on Sunday, May 7th, 2017, from 11am to 4pm.


Competition Location

The 2017 competition will be held on a new part of the WSU Innovation Campus! The attached map shows the location on the NE side of campus. Be sure to enter 19th Street from within the campus (19th street is not connected to Oliver yet). Click maps to download slightly bigger versions. Note the flying area and directional arrows to 19th street shown in red.

JPEG Image

Or, more accurately, as shown zoomed on this map.

PNG Image

We will fly within the green zone.

Event parking is on 19th street. Please be careful not to block traffic or other cars when you park.


Critical and Weather Related Information

Be sure to watch this site for last minute weather and other updates! This is the place for critical information.

Weather is an important factor in the competition. Moderate winds and occasional light rain will not necessarily postpone the event. Severe weather, very strong/gusty winds, heavy rain, or a chance of lightning will postpone the event.

Watch this site!



There are three participant categories:

  • WSU undergraduate
  • High school
  • Professional

Teams with alumni or graduate members participate in the professional category.

A successful design is well understood and properly developed from the beginning. Don’t let someone create a better overall design than you. Use aerospace engineering principles and methods to win!

Don't be shy. Form a team, build a plane, and fly! Mentors for high school and underclassmen student teams are recommended. Contact Dr. Miller for help finding a mentor. 



This year's design competition is for a “Lightweight High-Speed Emergency Relief UAV." The mission profile includes the following:    

  • Extract and quickly assemble a fully loaded and ready-to-fly aircraft
  • Take-off (hand launch), within 5-minutes of aircraft extraction
  • Deliver the emergency supplies during lap-3
  • Complete at least 5-laps total
  • Land successfully


Rules & Guidelines

Competing planes must meet the following requirements and constraints: 

  1. The aircraft (see Q&A #1, added 8/24/16) must be 100% conceived, designed, and built by team members
  2. The aircraft must utilize a single LiPo battery pack to operate all systems (see Q&A's)
  3. An easy to install/remove propulsion system fuse is required
  4. The fuse must be located at least 6-inches from anything dangerous
  5. The fuse limit can be no larger than 20-amps
  6. Aircraft must be made from commonly available model aircraft materials (e.g., balsa wood, basswood, spruce, foam) – nothing exotic (see Q&A's)
  7. All critical systems/components must be firmly mounted and accessible for quick repair or replacement (< 5-min)
  8. No more that 2-oz of cured epoxy can be used to construct aircraft
  9. The use of any type of tape to secure anything on the plane is prohibited
  10. Velcro may be used to secure only the battery, Electronic Speed Control (ESC), receiver (RX), and wires
  11. All aircraft components, including the battery and payload, must fit into the deployment container
  12. The transmitter does not have to fit into the deployment container
  13. The container will be of square cross-section (width equal to height) and aspect ratio six (6)
  14. The aspect ratio is defined as the length divided by the height
  15. Each team must register their aircraft with the FAA prior to a first flight
  16. There will be one competition day 
  17. A designated WSU test pilot will fly the plane at the competition
  18. All primary aircraft components must remain attached during a mission
  19. Mission scores are not counted for aircraft sustaining significant flight related damage
  20. Aircraft changes, during the competition, that deviate significantly from the initial design configuration are not permitted
  21. Aircraft can be repaired and flown again during the competition, as long as all rules are satisfied
  22. All aircraft must pass a specified structural test (see below for details)
  23. All competition rules, requirements, and constraints are subject to interpretation and change at Dr. Miller’s discretion
  24. Additional rules, requirements, and constraints can be added anytime
  25. Review all sections of this web page regularly, especially the Q&A’s
  26. Team members assume all risk with respect to disqualification
  27. Substantial requests for department support, supplies, parts, systems, cutting, etc. within 3-weeks of the competition can not be honored


Flying Location

The exact flying location will be announced in the spring. The dimensions are approximately 400x100-ft. Planes are expected to fly within this area at all times. The takeoff, landing, and payload drop zone is in the middle of the course, with turns approximately 300-ft apart. Competition day takeoffs and landings are on grass, not from a prepared hard-surface runway.



The competition mission score (MSCR) is calculated, when successful, using the following equation,  
     M  = (100/MT) + (VR) + (6/CO) + DAS

The Mission Time (MT), in seconds, starts the moment the plane is launched and ends when the plane successfully lands in the designated zone. The value is rounded to the nearest second.

As noted previously, all aircraft components, the battery, and the payload must fit into a rectangular deployment container. The smallest volume container is desired. A related (volume ratio) scoring parameter is given as,

    VR  = (130/container volume)

The container volume is rounded to the nearest cubic inch.

Vehicle cost is heavily influenced by electronic and control system complexity. As a result, a vehicle complexity/cost scoring parameter is given as:

    CO  = number of actuators, Electronic Speed Controls (ESCs), & motors utilized

A payload of emergency supplies, simulated by one (1) regulation size/weight tennis ball, must be delivered during the third lap within a roughly 30x30-ft square target zone. A Delivery Accuracy Score (DAS) is defined as follows:

    DAS  = 1, if the ball settles within the 30x30-ft zone, but outside a 20x20-ft zone
    DAS  = 2, if the ball settles within the 20x20-ft zone, but outside a 10x10-ft zone
    DAS  = 5, if the ball lands within the 10x10-ft zone

Balls may land, roll or bounce into a zone. The final resting place determines the score.

The team score is then calculated as,

    TSCR  = M – S

The team’s best mission score is used in the final TSCR calculation. “S” is the total number of “strikes” incurred by the team during the entire competition. The highest TSCR wins!



A team strike is given if the mission fails in any way. Specifically, the mission fails if:

  • The aircraft is not extracted, assembled and in the air within 5-minutes
  • The payload is not delivered within a drop zone during the third lap
  • The aircraft does not fly at least 5 complete laps
  • The aircraft lands outside the takeoff/landing zone
  • The aircraft sustains significant damage during the mission

Teams that crash or sustain significant damage due to “acts of nature” (i.e., extreme weather, bird strike, etc.) will not be assessed a strike, unless Dr. Miller determines the problem was due to design/engineering/preparation/execution issues.

Obviously, you should avoid receiving strikes at all cost. A good team effectively utilizes sound design methods, engineering principles, construction techniques, and preparation to achieve mission success. Don’t undervalue the beauty of simplicity within your efforts.

Keep in mind that proper engineering is not about trial and error or playing around until you find something that works as good as you can discover. Work very hard to keep a zero strike count. Employ engineering methods and prepare!


Structural Test

All aircraft must pass a structural test prior to first flight. As a result, all vehicles must include provisions for quickly installing a WSU structural test fixture.

The WSU test fixture and hole mounting dimensions are the same as those used to mount models in the 3x4-ft low speed wind tunnel and are given in the following document (click here for information on the "mount hole pattern," found on page 1, top-rt side). Aircraft must include blind nuts, to allow for easy and quick installation of the test fixture (using only screws).

A dead weight load, equal to the aircraft weight, will be applied through the test fixture. The vehicle will be suspended by no more than 1-inch of the wing tips during the test. Vehicles breaking during the test are not eligible to compete.


Department Support & Mentors

The planes will be relatively inexpensive to build. Some teams may be eligible for limited AE department assistance to help build their plane (e.g., radio gear, motor, assorted supplies, laser/foam cutting, etc.). However, support must be requested, prearranged, and approved at least 3-weeks before the competition.

Additionally, as mentioned, the department will do what it can to provide mentors to help less experienced teams. Contact Dr. Miller for further information on support and mentor opportunities.


Components & Data

As mentioned in the previous section, the AE department may be able to supply teams with components to build their planes. Here is some basic information on the most commonly utilized Receiver (RX), Engine Speed Control (ESC), and Servos:

There are other (riskier) options, but we typically have lots of these components available to use.

Proper battery selection is an important part of your design efforts. Unfortunately, battery labels can be a bit misleading. Conservative design selections are often wise. The best way to know is to test the batteries. Unfortunately, this is not always a viable cost option.

WSU has used two LiPo battery packs previously. Test data for these are available for download:

Perhaps these packs (if still available) will work for your design. If not, at least you get a sense of how the packs behave (worse than the label suggest).


Engineer of 2020

Eligible WSU students, especially seniors, might be able to gain “Engineer of 2020” service-learning credit. These opportunities must be prearranged. Contact Dr. Miller for further information.



Visit this section regularly for official Questions and Answers (Q&A’s) that can have an impact on your design efforts.

Q1: Are rotary wing aircraft (e.g., helicopters or quad-rotors) okay to compete?
A1: No, rotary wing aircraft are not allowed. (8/24/16)

Q2: Can the payload, simulated by one (1) regulation size/weight tennis ball, be modified (cut up, deflated, etc.)?
A2: No, the tennis ball payload cannot be modified in any way. It must remain a tennis ball (ready to play).

Q3: Can we utilize fabric or any other type of flexible material for the aircraft box?
A3: The aircraft container can be made of any desired material. However, notable bumps, bulges, or deviations in container cross-section or aspect ratio as specified are not allowed. (10/11/16)

Q4: Can we use accelerometers or other systems to improve the stability characteristics of our airplane? If so, would it increase the complexity score? Would more accelerometers result in a higher complexity score?  
A4: Stability augmentation or autopilot systems are allowed if they are designed and built by the team (i.e., not off-the-shelf systems). Since the design complexity and cost is increased the control system will be counted as a single actuator. (10/11/16)

Q5: Can we use composite components (e.g., graphite tubes) to build parts of our plane?
A5: No, the plane must be made from commonly available model aircraft materials (e.g., balsa wood, basswood, spruce, foam) – nothing exotic. (10/11/16)

Q6: Can we use aluminum tubes (e.g., arrow shafts) to build parts of our plane?
A6: No, the plane must be made from commonly available model aircraft materials (e.g., balsa wood, basswood, spruce, foam) – nothing exotic. (10/21/16)

Q7: Can teams make multiple flight attempts during the competition, in order to improve their mission score?
A7: Yes, multiple flights are allowed to improve the mission score. However, keep in mind that failure to complete a mission attempt results in a strike.

Q8: How are scores from multiple mission flights used to calculate the final team score?
A8: The best result for all successful missions flown (minus the number of strikes incurred during the entire competition) is used to determine the final team score.

Q9: Do two or more battery packs wired in parallel (or series) count as a single battery?
A9: No, two or more battery packs wired in parallel (or series) count as two or more battery packs.

Q10: Can I modify battery packs, build my own, or use exotic/special packs?
A10: No, the battery pack must be off-the-shelf, from commonly available model aircraft sources, unmodified, and safe.

Remember to check this area regularly! Contact Dr. Miller, by email, with questions - scott.miller@wichita.edu


Special Thanks

Special thanks go to WSU alumni and friends who provided ideas and suggestions for this year’s competition, including some at the Lockheed Skunk Works.


Additional Information

Contact Dr. Miller, by email, with questions - scott.miller@wichita.edu

Here is a Bronze Propeller competition flyer you can print, post, and share (click here)        


"What I cannot build, I cannot understand" - Feynman






Just for Fun - Here's Some Cool Stuff From the 2016 Competition 

Team Shock Drop won the 2016 Bronze Propeller Competition! Congratulations to the following WSU undergraduate students (L-to-R in photo):

  • Mitchell Thompson
  • Kevin Hagen
  • Chris Oline
  • Wei Khoo
  • Miro Penheiro

Their names will be placed on the historic Bronze Propeller Trophy, located in the WSU Aerospace Engineering office.

JPEG Image

Team Shock Drop - the 2016 Campions!

The complete competition results are as follows:

  • 1st-Place     Shock Drop
  • 2nd-Place    Just Wing It 
  • 3rd-Place     I-Drone
  • 4th-Place     Cloud


JPEG Image

Team Just Wing It - 2nd Place


JPEG Image

Team I-Drone - 3rd Place

JPEG Image

Team Cloud - 4th Place


JPEG Image

Jonathan Mowrey (left) - The Bronze Propeller test pilot (an amazing pilot!)



Be sure to visit this page often; don't miss important competition information and news!