logo
UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITY FORUM
Wichita State University

UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITY FORUM
May 1, 2009
 
Poster Evaluation Form


Name of Presenter:________________________Abstract Number:________

Judge's Name: ____________________________
 

CATEGORY 1: Statement of the problem and its significance

  • Has the researcher succinctly defined and delimited the research problem?
  • Has the researcher addressed the study's worth to the practitioner, to existing theoretical models, or to both?

 SCORE: (Poor) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (Exceptional)

CATEGORY 2: Methods

  • Has the researcher defined the participants, instruments, apparatuses, procedures, research design and statistical analysis where applicable?

 SCORE: (Poor) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (Exceptional)

CATEGORY 3: Results

  • Were statistics and/or other modes of analysis presented in sufficient detail (e.g., t test, F test, correlation, post-hoc, percentages, means, standard deviations, etc.)?

 SCORE: (Poor) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (Exceptional)

CATEGORY 4: Summary of the findings

  • Did the researcher provide a clear discussion of the results, summarize their relevance, and recommend directions for future research in this area where applicable?

 SCORE: (Poor) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (Exceptional)

CATEGORY 5: Could you read the poster from a distance of 3-5 feet?

 SCORE: (Poor) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (Exceptional

COMMENTS:___________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

This form is for your assistance and should be destroyed after use.

 

SESSION:__________________________________


Judge's Session Report

 

RANK NAMES and
ABSTRACT NUMBERS
OVERALL QUALITY
(AVERAGE SCORE)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.